News India Times

www.newsindiatimes.com – that’s all you need to know Dr. Sudhir M. Parikh Founder, Chairman & Publisher Ilayas Quraishi Chief Operating Officer Ela Dutt Editor Archana Adalja Contributing Editor T. Vishnudatta Jayaraman Advisor Arun Shah Ahmedabad Bureau Chief Peter Ferreira, Deval Parikh, Freelance Photographers Bhailal M. Patel Executive Vice President Jim Gallentine Business Development Manager - U.S. Shahnaz Sheikh Senior Manager Advertising & Marketing Sonia Lalwani Advertising Manager Shailu Desai Advertising New York Muslima Shethwala Syed Sheeraz Mahmood Advertising Chicago Digant Sompura Consultant for Business Development Ahmedabad, India Hervender Singh Circulation Manager Main Office Editorial & Corporate Headquarters 1655 Oak Tree Toad, Suite 155 Edison, NJ 08820-2843 Tel. (212) 675-7515 Fax. (212) 675-7624 New York Office Tel: (718) 784-8555 E-mails editor@newsindiatimes.com advertising@newsindia-times.com subscription@newsindia-times.com Website www.newsindiatimes.com Chicago Office 8846 Lavergne Ave, Skokie, IL 60077 Tel. (773) 856-3345 California Office 650 Vermont Ave, Suite #46 Anaheim, CA 92805 Mumbai Office Nikita Ajay Pai Goregaon, West Mumbai Ahmedabad Office 303 Kashiparekh Complex C.G. Road, 29 Adarsh Society Ahmedabad 380009 Tel. 26446947 F ax. 26565596 Published weekly, Founded in 1975. The views expressed on the opinion pages are those of the writers and do not necessarily reflect those of News India Times. Copyright © 2026, News India Times News India Times (ISSN 0199-901X) is published every Friday by Parikh Worldwide Media LLC., 1655 Oak Tree Toad, Suite 155 Edison, NJ 08820-2843 Periodicals postage paid at Newark, N.J. , and at additional mailing offices. Postmaster: Send address change to News India Times, 1655 Oak Tree Toad, Suite 155 Edison, NJ 08820-2843 Annual Subscription: United States: $28 Disclaimer: Parikh Worldwide Media assumes no liability for claims/ assumptions made in advertisements and advertorials. Disclaimer:The views and opinions expressed on this page are those of the authors and Parikh Worldwide Media does not officially endorse, and is not responsible or liable for them. Opinion News India Times (May 9, 2026 - May 15, 2026) May 15, 2026 3 Original Thinking Vs Automated Thinking India’s educational system needs an urgent, fundamental reset to encourage creativity and innovation and to avoid AI-generated slop I f you have read my columns over the years, you know I have been one of the loudest advocates for Indian innovation and engineering tal- ent. That belief has not wavered; I still see enormous potential. But I have now reached a point I never expected to reach: I have given up on India for one of the most critical roles I need to fill at Vionix Biosciences — a medical researcher who can think differently and devise new ways of detecting disease. Let me explain why. On paper, the candidates look out- standing. Their resumes are immaculate, with prestigious institutions, relevant in- ternships, publications, and glowing let- ters of recommendation. Even the emails, which not long ago were full of “plz”, “u”, and “thx”, have suddenly become pol- ished and articulate, with clean structure, perfect grammar, and sometimes genu- inely impressive phrasing. But this is just Artificial Intelligence (AI) generated slop. The moment you get on a call, the façade cracks. The same person who wrote that eloquent email cannot explain a simple scientific concept or walk you through their own claimed research. They hesitate, speak in vague generalities, and circle around questions without ever answering them. Push them to explain how they arrived at a conclusion in the proposal they supposedly wrote, and they either go silent or pivot elsewhere. This is worse than the illiteracy we see in most WhatsApp messages, because not even AI can put lipstick on this pig. I am not the only one complaining about Indian talent. A February 2026 LinkedIn report found that 74% of Indian recruiters are struggling to identify genu- ine talent, with more than half pointing to AI-generated applications as the cause. AI-generated résumés, essays, assign- ments, research proposals, and even aca- demic papers are rapidly becoming stan- dard, and the volume of convincing but hollow material is growing so quickly that the signal-to-noise ratio has collapsed. In business, the same pattern is playing out: Pitch decks and presentations that look polished fall apart under basic question- ing; strategy documents are assembled from generic frameworks rather than real insight; consultants present recommen- dations they cannot defend; executives rely on AI-generated briefs without truly understanding the assumptions behind them. What looks impressive on paper often disintegrates the moment real thinking is required. This is not only in India; we are already seeing the same cracks appear globally. Lawyers in the US have been sanctioned for submitting briefs that cited com- pletely fabricated cases generated by AI. Media organisations have had to issue embarrassing corrections after publishing AI-assisted content riddled with factual errors. Companies are quietly discover- ing that employees who rely heavily on AI tools can produce impressive-looking work quickly, but struggle when asked to defend it, adapt it, or go beyond it. This is going to hurt India the most because the educational foundation of its graduates is so antiquated. The education the British installed in India was designed to keep the people subservient. It rewards memorisation, pattern recognition, and compliance, and leaves little room for curiosity, ex- perimentation, or independent thought. Students are trained to deliver the correct answer, not to ask better questions. For decades, this system produced competent executors. In the age of AI, we are only com- pounding the disaster. Governments have always known this and often announced reforms, prom- ised to reduce rote learning, and talked about fostering creativity. But meaning- ful change has been slow, and now AI is exposing these weaknesses brutally, with teachers unable to keep pace with what their students are doing and institutions struggling to even measure real under- standing. India is now producing a generation that seems intelligent on paper but lacks depth. There is polish without substance, fluency without un- derstanding, and confidence without the discipline that comes from struggling through hard problems. Over time, this erodes intellectual honesty and replaces real capability with the illusion of competence. At Vionix, we are trying to solve some of the hardest problems in science, combin- ing physics, chemistry, and machine learning to detect disease early. This requires original thinking, not just technical competence; it requires the ability to question assumptions, design new approaches, and interpret complex signals. In India, all of the people I have interviewed cannot do anything like this. That is why I had to give up on the country for this new R&D position which required out-of-the-box thinking and questioning why things work the way they are. I am even thinking of moving this R&D back to the US. This should worry everyone, because the consequences are not limited to hir- ing frustrations or weak job candidates. Over time, this erodes the very foundation of innovation. A country that cannot pro- duce independent thinkers cannot lead in science, cannot build transformative companies, and cannot solve its hardest problems. It can only execute on ideas generated elsewhere — and even that becomes harder when the ability to truly understand begins to erode. Indian education needs an urgent, fun- damental reset — not incremental tweaks or policy announcements, but a serious rethink of what is taught, how it is taught, and how students are evaluated. Assess- ments need to reward original thought; classrooms need to encourage question- ing; students need space to explore, fail, and iterate; teachers need to be retrained to guide thinking, not just deliver content. Unless something changes — quickly — India will find that the very system that once powered its rise is now holding it back, leaving its brightest minds unable to compete in a world where real thinking is the only thing that cannot be automated. Vivek Wadhwa is CEO of Vionix Biosciences and has held academic appointments at institutions, including Harvard Law School, Stanford and Duke University. ByVivekWadhwa PHOTO:CourtesyVivekWadhwa PHOTO: ILLUSTRATED BY AI